We’re all on track to live to 100. This, according to…me! (supported, of course, by what I read about and see all around me)

As such, people are going to work longer for two reasons;

First, they will need to in order to fund a very long retirement and possibly ailing health during their post-work years.

Second, they will want to because even if financially secure, they will want to continue working versus living a retired life for upwards of 40 years. There is only so much travel, bridge, gardening, etc that one can do.

The speed of change is happening faster than anyone living has ever seen. People are being sideswiped by the speed of change because many have already moved from pen/paper to computer, landline to smartphones, bank tellers to (now outdated) ATMs and then some. They (including me) all slowly but surely adapted to new realities, but the pace is picking up. And, jobs and requirements of the workforce are changing. Radically. We have seen this already and what is forecast to be come due to AI alone, confirms that we need to brace ourselves for more learning and adapting.

So, we got this, right? I’m saying yes, we do!

If you’re not keen on ‘new’, start warming up to it…we can do this. We all have to keep adapting and supporting each other, our colleagues, our communities and working together to learn and remain relevant to the workforce AND to the world around us.




A quote from a millennial who just left a Big 4, by choice, in a major NA city;

“Educated people will not work for these firms in the future. To work for them, people need to have no self esteem and a burning desire to please without having a stake in the bigger picture”.


A little taken aback by these words, I went to each of the Big 4 websites to see who is in charge. Shout out to Deloitte who seems to have the most diverse leadership team. KPMG’s website…well, I thought I hit the wrong site. Outdated and difficult to navigate. Why. It’s 2018. Honestly…

While young people may not stay long, they should not be speaking so poorly at what should be an A+ firm. They should be leaving saying they learned a lot, it was valuable and they would recommend it to others despite not being the place for them long term. That would be fine.

“Educated people will not work for these firms in the future” is just awful.

I have repeated this to several people and each one, without exception, has said that everyone knows this about these firms and that their current claim to fame is loosening the dress code policy.

Bravo, Big 4, Bravo!

What’s next, transparent billing practices?

Big 4, listen up; if smart, engaged employees are saying this about you, you know what’s coming next…or it may already be haunting you…your clients are going to question if you are the right firm for them.

Sounds like you need to act now.

Like…now….all hands on deck!



Regardless of the position you are hiring, you will see that people who know how to get things done are not going to let you down. People who have a ‘let’s do this’ attitude are going to deliver. Look for it in the hiring process – when you ask candidates how others would describe their personality, look for answers such as ‘someone who gets things done’, then ask for specific examples. These examples could also come from their home or school life – you are looking for people who instinctively go the extra mile to get results….complete projects, help others without being asked, right a wrong.
Don’t compromise on this.
When you have a team of people who know how to get things done, you will fly.

Not once, but twice in the past year, I saw employers pull job offers from candidates.



In both cases, the candidates  played hard ball while negotiating their compensation and the employer did not like what they were seeing.

I am sure this has happened many times, but I had never seen it before. While I was appropriately taken aback the first time, I was just stunned the second time! Lesson learned.

If you are in the market, while you should not take a deal that you think is unfair, 

consider at what point you would be sorry to see the offer retracted,

and guide your negotiations accordingly.

Both candidates were blind-sided by losing their offer. They both went from being ‘tough negotiator’ to being  quite humble. Would they play it differently today if they were to go back? I’m not sure, but my instinct tells me they would. Both were keen to join their respective new employer and both were well qualified for their position. Alas, we will never know, but what we do know is it makes good sense to know when to stop negotiating and accept the offer. You never know…




Candidates like to tell  me what they cannot do.

I hear it all the time;

Lori: “Do you speak French”

Candidate: (cue the apologetic tone) “…well, I am not fluent and my written is weak….I prefer an English environment”

Lori: “Do you speak French today in your job and do you communicate in French through email”?

Candidate: “Yes”

I have this conversation repeatedly – replace “Do you speak French” with “Have you ever implemented an ERP system” or “Have you ever sold widgets”? It doesn’t matter what I ask, even if the candidate DOES DO, or has done, what I’m asking, but it deviates ever so slightly, they apologetically tell me that they really don’t do it.

As a candidate, you don’t want to limit yourself and prospective opportunities, you want to do just the opposite. You want  to take a hard look at your accomplishments and translate them in to your complete skill set, and recognize what are your transferable skills. Once you have done this, you may see that you have more to offer than you give yourself credit for. Don’t sell yourself short! If you speak French but cannot write a business letter in French, then you do speak French! You will tell your perspective employer that you cannot write business documents in French but that you are fine with basic email correspondence, for example.

Don’t be so hard on yourself.

As I say (and believe!) we are all on track to live to 100, and as such, we will be working for a long time.

Don’t be drab and inflexible – Yes, you CAN!





The market tells us (IN FACT IT IS SCREAMING AT US) that anyone you hire will stay somewhere around 2-3 years (there will be exceptions, of course). Regardless of the years of seniority or level. If you are still fighting this, I urge you to reconsider your stance and to recognize why it isn’t a problem;

When you bring someone on board, you should be doing so with specific goals in mind. None of us know what is coming down the road, so why pretend we know what we need from the new hire long term? What you do know is what is needed now and the foreseeable future and this is where you need the new hire to be successful.

Hire resources on a “TOUR OF DUTY“. It  is a win/win! This entails hiring someone as an employee of the company, taking on full responsibilities (P&L, resources, etc) but there are specific goals to be met, for example, developing a product, developing new business, selecting and implementing a new ERP, building a new department, and so on. These goals will define the TOUR. At the end of the tour, if there is another tour and both you and the candidate agree for more – go for it! And if not, you shake hands. They walk away with more experience and a successful story to bring to their next position and you have achieved your goals and can replace them (if you need to at all) with someone who meets the next set of goals.

To continue hiring with the awkward words nobody speaks upon signing an employment agreement, which are “this will be great until one of us doesn’t need the other any longer”, makes no practical sense. Be up front. You will have a better chance of retaining the employee for what you need them for versus having to worry about them leaving before the goals have been achieved. Pretty much everyone like to have a  win, and the ones who don’t or who don’t care, are not the ones you want working for you. If you are upfront in  defining the circumstances, the employee knows exactly what they are signing up for and what they will walk away with once they have completed the work. On the employer’s side, you will have better success in meeting your business objectives. Win/win. The end.





Sometimes you read a job posting and think “I can do that”.  In most cases, you are probably right. However, if you don’t have the experience required, it is nearly impossible that a hiring manager will consider your candidacy. 

We receive resumes on an ongoing basis, from candidates who do not have the appropriate qualifications for the positions we are recruiting. Some of these candidates are very impressive – they are senior and accomplished. But I find it curious that they would apply for a position for which they are not qualified. And unfortunately, at least in my opinion, it find it a lack of judgement on their part which I have to assume is not their intent.

Applying for a position takes time and effort. As such, apply for a position to which you are best suited versus one you think you can do. Skills are definitely transferable, but within reason. A hiring manager will almost certainly reject your candidacy if you are not an obvious contender. Why would they engage with a candidate who does not offer the experience to support what is needed for the position?

Stay focused on your search. Apply to the right opportunities and put the effort in to preparing the best application possible, including a cover letter.


Historically, it has been called the “cover letter”. Whether it is a formal letter or a brief introduction in the body of an email with the attachment of your resume, in my opinion, it is important and will set you apart from other candidates, provided it is done correctly. If you are applying for a position, it should be because you truly see yourself as a fit. As such, you want the hiring manager to see the same thing. Explain this in the cover;

  • Refer to the position specifically
  • Pick highlights of the position description and state what relevant experience you have – stay high level (the CV will provide more detail and the interview even more…)
  • Make it obvious that you are a suitable candidate
  • Keep it brief

Don’t make the cover letter about you, make it about the position and reference the experience you have relative to what the employer is looking for.

If you prepare a proper cover/introduction, you will increase your chances of getting the attention of the hiring manager. While it won’t guarantee an interview, it adds value to your profile. Your competition is not doing it – although they should be – so in the meantime, take advantage and run with it.


Whether you are hiring or looking to be hired, throughout the process, watch for red flags.

A red flag will be some type of irritant or some type of “huh?” moment in your discussions with a candidate or potential employer that makes you feel uncomfortable. Did you meet with a candidate who had the PERFECT, hard-to-find skill set but who had an arrogance about them that you could not get passed?  You won’t like that arrogance any better if they work for you. Didn’t like the commute to the interview? You won’t like it any better when you start working there.

It is easy to overlook red flags. If we really want something to work, we are more likely to convince ourselves the issue is not that bad.

Throughout the hiring process, if there is a red flag(s) , do everyone a favour and walk away. The likelihood is, it simply will not work. You will either resent your new hire from the moment they start, or your new boss from the moment you are shown your new desk. When you are in the process, it might seem that the easiest thing to do is hire the candidate or take the job despite the red flag(s), but in the end, it is not worth it and the time wasted on hiring the wrong candidate or accepting the wrong position could have been better spent finding the right one.





When you ask someone how they are, do you ever hear “busy” or “swamped”? Is it something you might say too? I hear it all the time. We are all so ‘busy’…it is as if suggesting we are not busy, might lead others to think we are not successful, not contributing or, even worse…not needed! Naturally, I am referring to day-to-day life versus times when life throws us a curve ball.

Who isn’t busy? What does busy mean? If we really are that busy, it likely means we have over-extended ourselves and admitting it, rather than making us look good, actually makes us look bad…at the very least, it makes us look disorganized and suggests we are not in control.

Candidates contact me on a regular basis. I ask if they have a CV, or in what state their LinkedIn profile is…I also ask if they have kept up with their professional network. I hear the same thing over and over again; that they know they really should have a CV and that they should have a proper LinkedIn profile and should have kept up with their professional network, overall skills and with the job market in general. But…they haven’t. They have been too busy. The downside? Missed opportunities and becoming (or perhaps already have become) outdated to the market.

Keeping up with your profile, network, and skills is important if you want to be relevant to the market. Playing catch-up is not fun. Assume the people you would compete with for your next position have their CV, profile, skills and professional network up-to-date at all times. And if you don’t think this needs to be a priority because your job is secure, based on the calls I get, this is not the right assumption. Many (too many, in my opinion) people I speak to did not expect to be contacting me.

Let’s agree that everyone is busy. Students are busy, parents are busy, employees are busy, business owners are busy…we get it. Do yourself a favour and don’t drop the ball when it comes to nurturing yourself professionally.